Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Syria, using chemical weapons?



Syria, using chemical weapons?  I cannot help but to think back to the Iraq war and Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction.  The United States government or the powers that be have a history of deceiving the masses in order to satisfy an ends dating back to the Spanish American War and the USS Maine.  During the first Iraq war I had friends in the Special Forces on the ground.  They were engineers and their orders were to teach the Kuwaitis how to cross drill in order to rob Iraq of its oil reserves.  In addition to this Iraq was being denied access to the gulf in order to ship its exports, this was done in spite of a pre-existing agreement.   This is all information that was out prior to the war but our media, which is not free, did not report on it.  I wonder what information our media is not reporting on this time around.  Can we trust our government to make the right choices?  Without a doubt there are forces that we are not aware of at play dictating international policy especially in terms of territory that produces oil.  Is it a coincidence that we have gone to war in four, soon to be five, different oil producing countries?  Of which only one (Afghanistan) indirectly attached the United States.  Now, keep in mind that almost all of the 911 terrorist was actually from Saudi Arabia and not from Afghanistan.  We are puppets in the game of domination, it is obvious that we have been misled but choose to be silent.  I guess we are the silent good guys that Martin Luther king spoke off.    

1 comment:

  1. Using chemical weapons would be a very serious atrocity. Even Hitler refused to use chems. For years dictators like Saddam and Assad have had chemical weapons to deter rebellion. Saddam actually used chemical weapons on the Kurds during the eighties and tons of the stuff were destroyed after the first Gulf War. The reason Saddam never came clean with UN weapons inspectors is that he could not afford to allow his domestic enemies to know that he did not have something horrible in his back pocket. That bluff eventually led to his down fall. Assad has been running the same play book but with much closer backing from Russia. I am afraid that this is a test. Based on reaction to this limited event, the Assad regime might actually try using them on a wider scale. The Syrian gov't can try to blame it on the rebels but chemical weapons are very closely held. I doubt seriously if any are in rebel hands.

    ReplyDelete