
According to this
article, we tend to let our emotions, group identities, and unconscious drives
guide our behavior. Therefore, we tend to think and solve problems
unconsciously just for the fact that we understand and are capable of feeling
and letting our inner behavior take over. Changing the context of something can
definitely increase our chances of making a change because our behavior would
react in an unconscious way; that means, we will do what our “inner instinct”
wants us to do which most of the time leads to compassion and the need of
helping others. Another factor that can be what’s making a difference and
putting us in the “Enlightenment age” is the fact that we have the resources to
do so. All the information and technology we can gather nowadays allows us to
be more alert and more connected to the world.
Like David Bornstein stated on this article “The upshot is that we’re now in a better
position to recognize what works and what doesn’t in a variety of areas — like
which methods to reduce child abuse and prevent unwanted teen pregnancies
appear most effective, or what studies tell us about how to improve the
teaching of math or writing, or which police tactics are most effective at
reducing crime”. We as individuals and as a society, as difficult as it can
be to believe, are increasing the chances of having a better society, a better
world, and even better citizens.
The link to the article
is here:
The author has totally missed what should be the central point: the Enlightenment was about fostering individual freedom of thought. The social engineering that characterizes today's society is about controlling thought and channeling individual behavior into the patterns that the experts (and we support far too many of them) think it should be.
ReplyDeleteWe could therefore more appropriately refer to the current era as an age of "Anti-Enlightenment".